Abstract
Developing tools and methodologies for the evaluation of sustainable buildings is essential to promote transparency in the building design community. Building sustainability includes attributes from the built, natural, and social systems and inherently requires a series of trade-offs. These complex and often competing priorities require consideration at each stage of a building's life cycle.
A total of 24 environmental, social, and economic indicators were developed and applied to three alternative building systems: cross-laminated timber (CLT), steel and glass, and reinforced concrete.
The goal of this study was to demonstrate the use of a multi-attribute decision support system (MADSS) that uses a series of indicators, assigns numerical values to these indicators, and then allows for systematic evaluation and ranking of alternatives. A case study approach was used to demonstrate the utility of the MADSS approach in identifying “hot spots” and trade-offs for the three building systems. Portland, Oregon, was selected as the location for the alternative buildings. The functional unit for this study was a mixed-use nine-story building with an area of 19,000 ft2. All processes from extraction of raw materials to end-of-life operations were considered in this study. The CLT building was found to have a higher rank compared with concrete and steel in all three attributes of environmental, economic, and social sustainability.
The results of this study are intended to serve as a demonstration of the MADSS tool for building systems and to identify hot spots in the various indicators utilized for sustainability evaluation. The ranking of environmental, social, and economic attributes of building materials on specific indicators will vary with the interests of stakeholders and the building's location, type, design, and other factors.