Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Growing environmental awareness is leading to an increased interest in the use of biobased adhesives and proteins such as vital gluten. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the wood-particle moisture content, water application, and press time on the internal bond strength, thickness expansion, and thickness swelling of particleboards glued with vital gluten. Green and dried wood particles with similar moisture content were achieved through drying or water addition and were blended with vital gluten powder and pressed for 1 to 3 minutes. The results show that not only the pressing time and moisture content, but also the way of achieving the moisture content, has a strong impact on the performance of the boards. At comparable moisture content, never-dried (green) particles with high moisture content in combination with a dry adhesive application produced boards that performed better than boards made of dry particles with water addition to simulate liquid adhesive application.

A particleboard in its original form is an engineered wood product (EWP) made of wood particles that are hot pressed in the presence of an adhesive and other additives to form a flat board (panel). The species of which the particleboard is made, the shape of the particles, their size, and their distribution within the board have a strong impact on the mechanical properties of the board (Lundqvist and Gardiner 2011). The development of wood-based boards is closely linked to the development of the adhesive because the quality of the bonding is one factor determining the performance and properties of the product. Condensation adhesives are commonly used for particleboard and are delivered in liquid form and consisting of linear or branched oligomers and polymers in aqueous solution or dispersion. As the adhesive cures, the polymers convert to a three-dimensional, cross-linked network that is insoluble and nonmeltable (Dunky 2003). Recently, the conventional adhesives are 90 percent amino-plastics such as urea-melamine-formaldehyde, 4 percent phenolic plastics such as phenol-formaldehyde, 3 percent polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate, and 3 percent others (Berglund and Rowell 2005, Niemz and Wagenführ 2012, Funk et al. 2017). Additives are substances added to the EWP to bond wood particles together (i.e., adhesives) or to improve the properties of the EWP and facilitate board manufacture (Sandberg 2016).

The use of biobased adhesives is marginal in volume compared with the use of synthetic adhesives. The problem when using a biobased adhesive such as protein is that the formulations are sensitive to the source of protein and require time-consuming adjustments leading to low production capacity and therefore higher costs. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the particleboard glued with protein-based adhesive are positively related to the moisture content (MC) of the mat before pressing, and at comparable moisture content, the boards require higher pressing times than boards glued with synthetic adhesive (Krug and Tobisch 2010). The motivation for this research was to reduce this adhesive-related problem in particleboard production and to find ways to improve the manufacturing process when using one of the emerging biobased adhesives in the forest products industries, namely, vital gluten.

Vital gluten is a form of wheat gluten. Wheat gluten is derived from wheat kernels or their flour by processes leading to the separation of starch and gluten. Vital gluten is gluten isolated and produced under mild temperature conditions, and it therefore still has its ability to form a molecular network with viscoelastic properties (Van Der Borght et al. 2005).

In general, adhesives based on natural proteins can be classified as dispersion adhesives. Dispersion adhesives are not curing in the way condensation adhesives are, but they are setting by evaporation of the liquid phase into the wood substrate or atmosphere (Frihart 2013). Therefore, when dispersion adhesives such as protein-based adhesives are used in particleboard production, they often require longer pressing times than condensation adhesives (see, e.g., Khosravi et al. 2010 or Lei et al. 2010). The required temperature during the hot pressing process is at least 130°C, which is, according to Metzger (2007), the critical temperature required to achieve melting and polymerization of wheat protein. Polymerization of the protein, i.e., curing of the adhesive, leads to a higher water resistance of the bond line.

An aqueous solution of the adhesive is used in particleboard production to achieve a uniform adhesive spread on the wood particles and to provide a uniform wetting. Owing to the excess bound water in particles, the wood is often dried to an MC of 2 to 8 percent, with the optimum MC depending on the water content of the adhesive used. Too high an MC in the particle mat before pressing leads to longer press times and increases the risk of delamination of the particleboard when the pressure is released after pressing, due to a high internal vapor pressure (Kelly 1977, Irle and Barbu 2010). Overpenetration of the adhesive into the wood particles also has to be avoided because it leads to a decrease in the amount of adhesive available for the necessary wood–adhesive and adhesive–adhesive interactions (Frihart 2013).

A certain amount of water is, however, needed to allow for heat transfer from the heating platens to the core of the particleboard during hot pressing and to support plasticization of the wood particles. Variations in the MC of the particles in the cross-section of the particle mat affect the density profile of the finished board, and this in turn affects the mechanical properties of the particleboard (Kelly 1977, Wong et al. 1998).

In summary, a specific amount of water is needed in particleboard production to promote a uniform distribution of the adhesive, to bring the adhesive into close contact with the surface of wood particles, to transfer heat during hot pressing from the heating plates to the core of the panel, to plasticize the particles, and to regulate the mechanical properties of the panel. With conventional adhesives, water is applied in liquid form on the surface of the particles during adhesive application. When biobased adhesives such as vital gluten are used in powder form, the MC of the wood particles must be considerably higher than when conventional adhesives are used, and according to Trischler and Sandberg (2015), it is beneficial if the particles and the water in these are frozen when the vital gluten is applied. Such a process has the following advantages:

  • The poor solubility of vital gluten in water (Örnebro et al. 2000) will not influence the production process because it is applied as powder.

  • There is no denaturation of the vital gluten or its derivatives by chemical, mechanical, or thermal treatment to improve the solubility before application is needed; see, e.g., Nordqvist et al. (2010, 2012, 2013) or D'Amico et al. (2013).

  • Problems during the blending of particles with water and the vital gluten due to agglomeration of the protein in the presence of warm water are avoided (Trischler and Sandberg 2015).

  • The MC of the wood particles can be regulated independently from the adhesive content, which is advantageous for regulating the pressing time and the cross-sectional density profile and thus the mechanical properties of the panels (Kelly 1977, Wong et al. 1998).

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the wood-particle MC, water application, and pressing times on some important properties of particleboards glued with a wheat-protein vital gluten adhesive.

Materials and Methods

Three-layer particleboards were produced from a mixture of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) particles with different initial MC. MC is defined as the weight of water in wood, expressed as a percentage of the ovendry weight of the same sample.

The particles were separated by size into those smaller than 3 mm for the surface layers and those larger than 3 mm (to a maximum of 48 mm) in fiber direction for the middle layer. The mixing proportion was about 80 percent by weight of Norway spruce and 20 percent of Scots pine particles; however, accurate information about the mixture of the particles cannot be given because the particles were received directly from a particleboard mill.

Two types of particles were used for the study: never-dried (green) particles with a mean MC of approximately 50 percent and dried and conditioned particles with a mean MC of 6 percent. The green particles were dried in a universal drying oven at 103°C to 15, 20, or 25 percent MC, and the dry particles were sprayed with water to achieve a mean MC of about the same level, i.e., 15, 20, or 25 percent (Table 1), in order to study how the origin of the particles (green or dried) and the MC adjustment before particleboard production may influence the properties of the particleboards when vital gluten is used as adhesive. After adjustment of the MC, the particles were stored in sealed packages at −10°C before adhesive application and pressing.

Table 1 Design of the experiments.a

          Table 1

The wheat-protein vital gluten (Amygluten from Tereos; Fig. 1) was applied as a powder on the frozen particles. The amount of vital gluten was fixed at 10 percent based on the dry weight of the particles.

Figure 1.—. Vital gluten in its natural form as powder.Figure 1.—. Vital gluten in its natural form as powder.Figure 1.—. Vital gluten in its natural form as powder.
Figure 1 Vital gluten in its natural form as powder.

Citation: Forest Products Journal 68, 2; 10.13073/FPJ-D-17-00036

The pressing time, excluding press closure (10 to 20 s) and opening (approx. 30 s), was varied from 1 to 3 minutes. The press temperature was fixed at 160°C. The target thickness of the boards was 11.5 mm, controlled by a duct spacer, and the target density was 550 kg/m3. The size of the boards was 500 by 500 mm. The target thickness and density together with the thickness expansion (TE) of the particleboard when the press was opened, i.e., the percent difference between the target thickness and the final thickness, was determined after conditioning at 20°C and 65 percent RH (relative humidity) for 2 weeks.

Samples for testing thickness swell (TS) and internal bond strength (IB) were prepared from each board and conditioned at 20°C and 65 percent RH for an additional 7 days. The samples were prepared by trimming the boards from each side (9 cm) to avoid any edge effects. Afterward they were quartered through the center, and out of each quarter, nine samples with in-plane dimensions of 50 by 50 mm2 were cut. Out of these nine samples, two samples for testing IB and two samples for testing TS were randomly selected. Four samples were tested according to the following schedules:

  • TS according to EN 317: 50 by 50-mm2 specimens were immersed in water and maintained at a temperature of 20°C for 2 and 24 hours (European Committee for Standardization [CEN] 1993a).

  • IB according to EN 319: 50 by 50-mm2 specimens were tested in a universal testing machine using a loading rate of 10 mm/min (CEN 1993b).

Results

Table 2 presents the thickness, thickness extension, and density of the particleboards after 2 weeks of conditioning and the results of the TS test after 2 and 24 hours of immersion in water. The results of the IB test are presented graphically in Figure 2 in relation to the value required by the standard EN 312 (CEN 2010). Table 3 shows the effects of particle type and pressing time on the TE, TS, and IB of the particleboards.

Table 2 Particleboard thickness, thickness expansion (TE), and density of the particleboards made of green (No. 1 to 7) and dried (No. 8 to 14) particles, pressed at 160°C for 1 to 3 minutes, and thickness swelling (TS) after 2 weeks of conditioning at 20°C and 65 percent RH.

          Table 2
Figure 2.—. Internal bond strength (IB) for particleboards made of green particles (series No. 1 to 7) and dried particles with water application (series No. 8 to 14). The horizontal dashed lines show the P1 and P2 values of standard EN 312. The box-and-whiskers plot shows median and upper and lower quartiles of the IB.Figure 2.—. Internal bond strength (IB) for particleboards made of green particles (series No. 1 to 7) and dried particles with water application (series No. 8 to 14). The horizontal dashed lines show the P1 and P2 values of standard EN 312. The box-and-whiskers plot shows median and upper and lower quartiles of the IB.Figure 2.—. Internal bond strength (IB) for particleboards made of green particles (series No. 1 to 7) and dried particles with water application (series No. 8 to 14). The horizontal dashed lines show the P1 and P2 values of standard EN 312. The box-and-whiskers plot shows median and upper and lower quartiles of the IB.
Figure 2 Internal bond strength (IB) for particleboards made of green particles (series No. 1 to 7) and dried particles with water application (series No. 8 to 14). The horizontal dashed lines show the P1 and P2 values of standard EN 312. The box-and-whiskers plot shows median and upper and lower quartiles of the IB.

Citation: Forest Products Journal 68, 2; 10.13073/FPJ-D-17-00036

Table 3 Statistical analysis to determine the influence of particle type (green or dried) and pressing time (1 or 3 min) on internal bond strength (IB, in N/mm2), thickness expansion (TE, in %), and thickness swelling (TS, in %) of the particleboards glued with vital gluten.

          Table 3

The results in Table 2 show that the TE, and therefore also the thickness of the boards, tends to increase with increasing MC at a given pressing time. The results for TS show that most of the swelling occurs within the first 2 hours and is slightly higher for the boards made of green particles.

The IB within the different groups increased with increasing pressing time and was in general higher for the particleboards produced from green particles (No. 1 to 7) than for those made of dried particles moistened before adhesive application (No. 8 to 14) (Fig. 2).

The statistical data in Table 3 show that there are differences depending on the type of particles. The reconditioned green particles performed better than those made of dried and moistened particles, but the statistical analysis taking into consideration the scatter of the data shows that these differences between the two groups are not significant.

The analysis of the data for 1 and 3 minutes pressing time shows a significant influence of the pressing time on IB and TE (P = 0.011 and P = 0.021, respectively), a longer pressing time giving higher IB and TE values, but no significant influence of pressing time on TS.

Discussion

In general, a low MC during the pressing phase leads to boards with poor mechanical properties, an MC that is too high seems to prevent a setting of the dispersion adhesive because of lack of water evaporation and a polymerization of the vital gluten due to continuous volatilization of water, which led only to a moderate increase of temperature above 100°C in the core of the panel (Metzger 2007, Nordqvist 2012). The results of this study thus agree with the findings of earlier studies by, e.g., Kelly (1977) and Khosravi (2015).

At a given mean MC, the particleboards produced in a conventional way, i.e., dry particles and moistening to adjust the MC to the required level, had a lower IB and TS and a higher TE than the boards produced from green particles. The mean values of IB and TS (2 h), e.g., were respectively70 and 34 percent higher when the boards were made from green particles. These results, especially the high TE, are an indication for incomplete curing or bonding of the adhesive when applied in liquid form on dry particles.

A probable explanation for the poor properties of boards produced from dry particles is that the water applied is located mainly close to the surface of the particles. During the hot pressing process, this water can evaporate quickly instead of contributing to the softening of the particles and improving the adhesion between particle surfaces. In green particles, this evaporation process into the mat is presumably slower, and the vital gluten can absorb the additional moisture needed for its polymerization.

The boards made of green particles with a pressing time of 3 minutes showed an increase in IB with increasing MC. For boards made of dry particles, this was not the case; the highest IB was reached at an MC of 20 percent (series No. 12). The reason may be more incomplete bonding owing to the relatively high amount of free water. This result is important when developing vital gluten adhesives for the conventional particleboard production process. It seems possible to use green particles with a higher MC because this may be beneficial for the plasticization of the wood particles and lead to boards with better properties.

The results show that it is not possible to reduce the pressing time when using vital gluten by lowering the MC; particleboards made of particles with 15 percent MC (series No. 1 and 2, and 8 and 9) showed poor properties. In contrast, the properties of the boards improved with increasing particle MC at a given pressing time. In general, the MC is important to enable moulding of the particle, to regulate the density profile of the final board, and to enable heat transfer during pressing (Kelly 1977). When vital gluten is used as the adhesive, the MC, in combination with the pressing time, has a strong impact on the properties of particleboards as shown in this study and by others; see also Metzger (2007) and Krug and Tobisch (2010).

The influence of freezing the green particles with high MC on the properties of the particles itself and the effects of time and temperature after blending the protein with the particles were not investigated. The temperature and the time span between blending of the protein with the particles and pressing can also influence the tacking and penetration of the protein-based adhesive system and, therefore, also the bonding.

Conclusions

The influences of wood-particle MC, water application, and pressing time on the IB, TE, and TS were investigated in the manufacture of particleboard with vital gluten powder as adhesive. When using vital gluten as adhesive, which probably involves setting rather than curing, the trade-off between MC within the mat and pressing time becomes crucial. The results show that by using green particles with a high initial MC, the particleboards perform better than those made of dry particles moistened with water to reach the target MC. The results suggest that the successful implementation of vital gluten adhesives in particleboard production may also require changes in the application technique and production process.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Tereos for providing the vital gluten Amygluten. Support from the COST Action FP1407 “ModWoodLife” project (Understanding wood modification through an integrated scientific and environmental impact approach), is gratefully acknowledged.

Literature Cited

  • Berglund, L.
    and
    R. M. Rowell.
    2005. Wood composites. In:Handbook of Wood Chemistry and
    WoodComposites.
    R. M. Rowell
    (Ed.).
    Taylor & Francis
    ,
    Boca Raton, Florida
    . pp. 279302.

  • D'Amico, S.,
    U. Müller,
    and
    E. Berghofer.
    2013. Effect of hydrolysis and denaturation of wheat gluten on adhesive bond strength of wood joints. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 129:24292434.

  • Dunky, M.
    2003. Adhesives in the wood industry. In:Handbook of Adhesive Technology. 2.
    A. Pizzi
    and
    K. L. Mittal
    (Eds.).
    Marcel Dekker Inc.
    ,
    New York
    . pp. 887956.

  • European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 1993a. Particleboards and fibreboards; determination of swelling in thickness after immersion in water. EN 317.

    CEN
    ,
    Brussels
    .

  • European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 1993b. Particleboards and fibreboards; determination of tensile strength perpendicular to the plane of the board. EN 319.

    CEN
    ,
    Brussels
    .

  • European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2010. Particleboards. Specifications. EN 312:2010. CEN, Brussels.

  • Frihart, C. R.
    2013. Wood adhesion and adhesives. In:Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites. 2nd ed.
    R. M. Rowell
    (Ed.).
    Taylor & Francis
    ,
    Boca Raton, Florida
    . pp. 255319.

  • Funk, M.,
    R. Wimmer,
    and
    S. Adamopoulos.
    2017. Diatomaceous earth as an inorganic additive to reduce formaldehyde emissions from particleboards. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 12(
    2
    ):9297.

  • Irle, M.
    and
    M. C. Barbu.
    2010. Wood-based panel technology. In:Wood-Based Panels: An Introduction for Specialists.
    H. Thömen,
    M. Irle,
    and
    M. Sernek
    (Eds.).
    Brunel University Press
    ,
    London
    . pp. 194.

  • Kelly, M. W.
    1977. Critical literature review of relationships between processing parameters and physical properties of particleboard.
    USDA Forest Service
    ,
    Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin
    .

  • Khosravi, S.
    2015. Protein-based adhesives for particleboards.
    KTH Royal Institute of Technology
    ,
    Stockholm
    .

  • Khosravi, S.,
    F. Khabbaz,
    P. Nordqvist,
    and
    M. Johansson.
    2010. Protein-based adhesives for particleboards. Ind. Crops Prod. 32:275283.

  • Krug, D.
    and
    S. Tobisch.
    2010. Use of proteins as binders for wood-based panels. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 68:289301.

  • Lei, H.,
    A. Pizzi,
    P. Navarrete,
    S. Rigolet,
    A. Redl,
    and
    A. Wagner.
    2010. Gluten protein adhesives for wood panels. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 24:15831596.

  • Lundqvist, S.-O.
    and
    B. Gardiner.
    2011. Key products of the forest-based industries and their demands on wood raw material properties.
    European Forest Institute
    ,
    Joensuu, Finland
    .

  • Metzger, M. T.
    2007. Naturnahe Bindemittel aus nachwachsenden Rohstoffen auf Proteinbasis zur Herstellung von Holzwerkstoffen.
    Technische Universität München
    ,
    Munich
    .

  • Niemz, P.
    and
    A. Wagenführ.
    2012. Werkstoffe aus Holz. In:Taschenbuch der Holztechnik.
    A. Wagenführ
    and
    F. Scholz
    (Eds.).
    Carl Hanser Verlag
    ,
    Munich
    . pp. 127259.

  • Nordqvist, P.
    2012. Exploring the wood adhesive performance of wheat gluten.
    KTH Royal Institute of Technology
    ,
    Stockholm
    .

  • Nordqvist, P.,
    F. Khabbaz,
    and
    E. Malmström.
    2010. Comparing bond strength and water resistance of alkali-modified soy protein isolate and wheat gluten adhesives. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 30:7279.

  • Nordqvist, P.,
    M. Lawther,
    E. Malmström,
    and
    F. Khabbaz.
    2012. Adhesive properties of wheat gluten after enzymatic hydrolysis or heat treatment—A comparative study. Ind. Crops Prod. 38:139145.

  • Nordqvist, P.,
    N. Nordgren,
    F. Khabbaz,
    and
    E. Malmström.
    2013. Plant proteins as wood adhesives: Bonding performance at the macro- and nanoscale. Ind. Crops Prod. 44:246252.

  • Örnebro, J.,
    T. Nylander,
    and
    A. C. Eliasson
    2000. Critical review—Interfacial behaviour of wheat proteins. J. Cereal Sci. 31:195221.

  • Sandberg, D.
    2016. Additives in wood products—Today and future development. In:Environmental Impacts of Traditional and Innovative Forest-Based Bioproducts.
    A. Kutnar
    and
    S. S. Muthu
    (Eds.).
    Springer
    ,
    Singapore
    , pp. 105172.

  • Trischler, J.
    and
    D. Sandberg.
    2015. Wheat protein as adhesive for wood products for interior use. Pro Ligno11:246252.

  • Van Der Borght, A.,
    H. Goesaert,
    W. S. Veraverbeke,
    and
    J. A. Delcour.
    2005. Fractionation of wheat and wheat flour into starch and gluten: Overview of the main processes and the factors involved. J. Cereal Sci. 41:221237.

  • Wong, E. D.,
    M. Zhang,
    Q. Wang,
    and
    S. Kawai.
    1998. Effects of mat moisture content and press closing speed on the formation of density profile and properties of particleboard. J. Wood Sci. 44:287295.

  • Download PDF
Copyright: © Forest Products Society 2018.